|
高木八尺文庫キャビネット内史料リスト -- no. 43 詳細
43. Peace with Germany(0216 - 0264) |
| (新聞記事切抜他) |
1) | “Redrawing the map of Europe,” by Charles Downer Hazen, Atlantic Monthly, vol. 123, no.4, pp. 545-554(0217-0222) |
2) | (手書きメモ) “Peace with Germany,” 5pp.(0223-0227) |
3) | “Rewriting the treaty,” New York Times, Feb. 12, 1920, 1p.(0228) |
4) | (手書きメモ) “Slesvig plebiscite 109-114,” 1p.(0232) |
5) | (手書きメモ) “Execution of P. Treaty,” 4pp.(0233-0236) |
6) | “Protocol signing set for Saturday; Lersner gives his pledge in view of allied concessions on Scapa Flow,” New York Times, Jan. 7, 1920, 1p.(0237) |
7) | “Germans ill-use allied mission ; officers insulted and attacked by German officers evacuating Baltic Provinces,” 1p.(0238) |
8) | “Peace in form,” New York Times, Jan. 12, 1920, 1p.(0239) |
9) | “Treaty signing is certain today,” New York Times, Jan. 10, 1920, 2pp.(0240-0241) |
10) | “The high command continues,” New York Times, Jan. 14, 1920, 1p.(0242) |
11) | “Entente troops arrive in Silesia; British soldiers also, now occupy the Flensburg Plebiscite region of Schleswig,” New York Times, Feb. 2, 1920, 1p.(0243) |
12) | “Before the plebiscites,” New York Times, Feb. 3, 1920, 1p.(0244) |
13) | “Germans trying to smash treaty?” New York Times, Feb. 10, 1920, 1p.(0245) |
14) | “Plebiscites,” New York Times, Feb. 13, 1920, 1p.(0246) |
15) | “Allies against intervention; insist treaty be executed,” 1p.(0248) |
16) | “Council agrees on economic policy; formulates cardinal principles for allied and other European states,” New York Times, Mar. 2, 1920, 1p.(0249) |
17) | “France acts alone to enforce treaty; policy on the Ruhr question significant for the future of the entente,” New York Times, Mar. 31, 1920, 1p.(0250) |
18) | “Cravath advises treaty revision; declares Germany's burden must be lightened for benefit of allies,” New York Times, Mar. 28, 1920, 1p.(0251) |
19) | “French meet no opposition; troops take control of Frankfort and nearby towns in perfect order,” New York Times, Apr. 7, 1920, 2pp.(0253-0254) |
20) | “Berlin surprised; feeling is bitter, Liberal Press had argued the French Would Not Act-- radicals delighted,” New York Times, Apr. 7, 1920, 1p.(0255) |
21) | “German labor and radicals demand withdrawal of regular troops from the neutral zone,” New York Times, Apr. 8, 1920, 1p.(0256) |
22) | “Fatal affrays in Frankfort,” New York Times, Apr. 8, 1920, 1p.(0257) |
23) | “Germany’s protest on French advance,” New York Times, Apr. 8, 1920, 1p.(0258) |
24) | “France must pay Frankfort loss, Berlin declares,” 1p.(0259) |
25) | “France to make stand on treaty at San Remo,” New York Times, Apr. 11, 1920, 2pp.(0260-0261) |
26) | “Allied experts to fix lump sum for Berlin to pay,” New York Times, May, [1920], 2pp.(0262-0263) |
|