|
|
高木八尺文庫キャビネット内史料リスト -- no. 42 詳細
| 42. Peace Treaty (To Dec, 1919) File 3 (0145 - 0215) |
| (新聞記事切抜) |
| 1) | “Ireland and the league; defeat of the covenant the most serious blow to nationalist aspirations,” New York Times, Nov. 9, 1919, 1p. (0146-0147) |
| 2) | “English editor on labor and league; Alfred G. Gardiner says it is a French peace, but that the treaty must be signed,” New York Times, Nov. 9, 1919, 1p.(0148) |
| 3) | “On killing the treaty,” New York Times, Nov. 11, 1919, 1p.(0149) |
| 4) | “French see victory lost by diplomats; Lauzanne says their sacrifices will be in vain if peace is not consummated,” New York Times, Nov. 12, 1919, 1p.(0150) |
| 5) | “Treaty’s chances in December; analysis of obstacles in way of compromise and possible means of overcoming them,” New York Times, Sunday, Nov. 23, 1p.(0151) |
| 6) | “13 proposed reservations,” The Harvard Crimson, Jan. 10, 1920, 2pp.(0152) |
| 7) | “To save the treaty,” New York Times, Nov. 5, 1919, 2pp.(0153-0154) |
| 8) | “Taft urges treaty with reservations; accept them and get votes enough to save League, he advises” New York Times, Nov. 9, 1919, 1p.(0157) |
| 9) | “French declare League is dead,” New York Times, Nov. 11, 1919, 1p.(0158) |
| 10) | “The two treaties,” New York Times, Nov. 15, 1919, 1p.(0159) |
| 11) | “Cecil sees treaty almost repudiated,” New York Times, Nov. 18, 1919, 1p.(0160) |
| 12) | “Anti-leaguer gets cold storage ride; Minnesota ex-soldiers end ex-congressman Lundeen's talk and run him out of town,” New York Times, Nov. 18, 1919, 2pp.(0161-0163) |
| 13) | “The only way to save the treaty,” New York Times, Nov. 18, 1919, 2pp.(0164-0165) |
| 14) | “Urged the senate to save Europe; Gen. Smuts, in belated message, pleaded that we not to blast the world's hopes,” New York Times, Nov. 20, 1919, 1p.(0166) |
| 15) | “A great responsibility,” New York Times, Nov. 19, 1919, 1p.(0167) |
| 16) | “Mr. Lodge’s triumph,” New York Times, Nov. 20, 1919, 1p.(0168) |
| 17) | “There must be a treaty,” New York Times, Nov. 21, 1919, 2pp.(0169-0170) |
| 18) | “Some British critics are lenient to us,” New York Times, Nov. 22, 1919, 1p.(0171) |
| 19) | “Paris still hopes for ratification,” New York Times, Nov. 22, 1919, 1p.(0172) |
| 20) | “Mr. Taft points the way,” New York Times, Nov. 22, 1919, 2pp.(0173-0174) |
| 21) | “The treaty at the polls,” New York Times, Nov. 24, 1919, 1p.(0175) |
| 22) | “It is the people’s treaty,” New York Times, Nov. 25, 1919, 1p.(0176) |
| 23) | “The treaty outlook; views on the meaning of the vote of the senators,” New York Times, Nov. 25, 1919, 1p.(0177) |
| 24) | “Says Lodge invited attack on Wilson; the Rev. Dr. Irvine declares Senator Refused to Hear Good Report of President or Treaty,” New York Times, Nov. 25, 1919, 1p.(0178) |
| 25) | “City, giving thanks, hears league pleas; pastors, in discussing spirit of gratitude, assail Senate for action on covenant,” New York Times, Nov. 28, 1919, 1p.(0181) |
| 26) | “Criticises Lodge’s action; Rustom Rustomjee says his attitude has encouraged revolutionists in India,” [Nov. 29, 1919], 1p.(0182) |
| 27) | “Asserts Lenroot plan endangers the League,” New York Times, [Nov. 29], 1919, 1p.(0183) |
| 28) | “Churchill predicts our aid in League,” New York Times, Nov. 30, 1919, 1p.(0184) |
| 29) | “Call in Massachusetts for action on treaty,” New York Times, Nov. 30, 1919, 1p.(0185) |
| 30) | “Congress session begins tomorrow,” New York Times, Nov. 30, 1919, 1p.(0186) |
| 31) | “Wilson defers talk on treaty,” [New York Times, Nov. 30], 1919, 2pp.(0187-0188) |
| 32) | “Demand for the treaty,” New York Times, Nov. 30, 1919, 1p.(0189) |
| 33) | “Some Mexican executions,” New York Times, Nov. 30, 1919, 1p.(0190) |
| 34) | “Anarchy or the League,” New York Times, Nov. 30, 1919, 1p.(0191) |
| 35) | “Inside view of Wilson’s work in Paris,” New York Times, Nov. 30, 1919, 1p.(0192) |
| 36) | “While he’s keeping her out,” 1p. The New York Times Magazine, Nov. 30, 1919, 1p.(0193) |
| 37) | “Headquarters of American peace delegates,” 1p. (写真2枚)(0194) |
| 38) | “Historic spot where the armistice was signed,” 1p. (写真1枚)(0195) |
| 39) | “Hays silent on treaty; some of his associates expect declaration on lodge’s stand,” 1p.(0196) |
| 40) | “Delay again,” New York Times, Dec. 2, 1919, 2pp.(0197-0198) |
| 41) | “Delay peace note for treaty action,” 1p.(0199) |
| 42) | “Delay peace vote for treaty action,” 1p.(0200) |
| 43) | “Regrets delay on treaty,” 1p.(0201) |
| 44) | “Blame America for delay; P. A. Jensen says people in Europe assail action on treaty,” 1p.(0202) |
| 45) | “Prince Medjid asks us to ratify treaty,” New York Times, Dec. 4, 1919, 1p.(0203) |
| 46) | “Mr.Balfour on the League,” New York Times, Dec. 5, 1919, 1p.(0204) |
| 47) | “By Charles H. Grasty,” New York Times, Dec. 5, 1919, 1p.(0205) |
| 48) | “Business and the treaty, New York Times, Dec. 6, 1919, 1p.(0206) |
| 49) | “Tells why peace pact fell short,” Cleveland Plain Dealer, Dec. 31, 1919, 1p.(0207) |
| 50) | “Urges stiffening Monroe Doctrine,” Cleveland Plain Dealer, [Dec. 31, 1919], 1p.(0208) |
| 51) | “Flick heads new historical body,” Cleveland Plain Dealer, Dec. 31, 1919, 1p.(0209) |
| 52) | “Idea of eliminating war grotesque and inconceivable, says scoffer at league,” The Harvard Opinion, Jan. 9, 1920, 1p.(0210) |
| 53) | “Treaty cannot be ratified in its present form ? Lodge,” [The Harvard Opinion], 1p.(0211) |
| 54) | “Colleges will vote on league tomorrow,” [The Harvard Opinion], 2pp.(0212-0213) |
| 55) | “Hitchcock brands Lodge’s reservations ‘Destructive’,” [The Harvard Opinion], Jan. 12, 1920, 1p.(0214) |
| 56) | 「タフトと留保案」『東京朝日新聞』1919.11.14, 1p.(0215) |
|
