|
高木八尺文庫キャビネット内史料リスト -- no. 84 詳細
84. Shantung File 2(0303 - 0323) |
| (新聞記事切抜) |
1) | “Reinsch and Taft clash on Japan,” The New York Times, Jan. 8, 1922, 1p.(0304) |
2) | “Chinese ask Hughes and Balfour to aid; delegates report on Shantung deadlock and are told good offices continue,” The New York Times, Jan. 8, 1922, 1p.(0305) |
3) | “Both sides hopeful of a Shantung plan; indications are that some new influence is operating to bring them together,” The New York Times, Jan. 10, 1922, 1p.(0306) |
4) | “President hopeful of Shantung accord; considers settlement of issue necessary to success of conference” The New York Times, Jan. 11, 1922, 1p.(0307) |
5) | “Japan to withdraw troops in Shantung; agreement on collateral issue results from resumption of direct conversations,” The New York Times, Jan. 12, 1922, 1p.(0308) |
6) | “Mediators offer Shantung program; Hughes and Balfour propose a formula on the railroad to Tokio and Peking,” The New York Times, Jan. 13, 1922, 1p.(0309) |
7) | “Chinese promise to open Kiao-Chau; "direct conversations" result in agreement on another phase of Shantung issue,” The New York Times, Jan. 14, 1922, 1p.(0310) |
8) | “Chinese accept terms on Kiao-Chau return; Dr. Wang denounces the 21 demands, saying they make his country a vassal,” The New York Times, Jan. 15, 1922, 1p.(0311) |
9) | “Japanese cross currents; opposing influences in shaping nation's policy at Washington--Holland's Islands and Treaty,” The New York Times, Jan. 15, 1922, 1p.(0312) |
10) | “Shantung decision likely this week; Japanese are believed ready to propose a plan for sale acceptable to Chine,” [The New York Times, Jan. 17, 1922], 1p.(0313) |
11) | “Underwood quiets Senate’s criticism of Shantung delay; supported by Lodge, he opposes Walsh resolution to ask president for facts,” The New York Times, Jan. 21, 1922, 2pp.(0314-0315) |
12) | “Shantung accord believed at hand; American delegation confident settlement will be made during coming week,” The New York Times, Jan. 23, 1922, 1p.(0316) |
13) | “Harding intervenes to break deadlock on Shantung issue; President urges Minister Sze to accept Tokio's latest compromise offer,” The New York Times, Jan. 26, 1922, 2pp.(0317-0318) |
14) | “Chinese sought action by Harding; minister Sze says he asked for White House Conference-- no pressure brought,” The New York Times, Jan. 27, 1922, 1p.(0319) |
15) | “Traffic manager in Shantung issue; Chinese declare a Japanese in that post means Tokio control of railway” The New York Times, Jan. 29, 1922, 1p.(0320) |
16) | “Agree on Shantung and naval treaty; work nearly ended; delegates clear up big questions and prepare for plenary session tomorrow,” The New York Times, Jan. 31, 1922, 2pp.(0321-0322) |
17) | “Shantung,” The New York Times, Feb. 2, 1922, 1p.(0323) |
|