|
|
高木八尺文庫キャビネット内史料リスト -- no. 71 詳細
| 71. [Naval] Ratio(0146 - 0161) |
| (新聞記事切抜) |
| 1) | “Kato nips round robin of Japanese writers; summons correspondents to warn against scheme to force the hand of delegation,” The New York Times, Nov. 18, 1921, 1p.(0148) |
| 2) | “Japan’s consent imminent, delegation not taking vice admiral Kato's views on ratio,” The New York Times, Nov. 30, 1921, 1p.(0149) |
| 3) | “Kato’s view personal, declares Tokugawa; prince says no ratio decision has been made--early agreement is predicted,” The New York Times, Nov. 30, 1921, 1p.(0150) |
| 4) | “British observer says American delegation will not yield on this question,” The New York Times, Nov. 30, 1921, 1p.(0151) |
| 5) | “Japan’s purpose clearer; not to wreck conference but to get advantages in other quarters” The New York Times, Dec. 2, 1921, 1p.(0153-0154) |
| 6) | “War possibility influences Japan,” The New York Times, Dec. 2, 1921, 2pp.(0155-0156) |
| 7) | “Expects Hughes proposal to win; but Lauzanne sees more danger in naval debate than in ChinoJapanese discussion,” 1The New York Times, Dec. 2, 1921, 1p.(0157) |
| 8) | “Repington defends 5-5-3 naval ratio; says Japan's proposal to disregard battleships under construction is unjust,” The New York Times, Dec. 2, 1921, 1p.(0158) |
| 9) | “Harding optimistic of the conference; his view is that the progress made may be called almost too rapid,” The New York Times, Dec. 2, 2pp.(0159-0160) |
|
