|
高木八尺文庫キャビネット内史料リスト -- no. 62 詳細
62. France(0021 - 0041) |
| (新聞記事切抜) |
1) | “France to oppose curb on her navy,” The New York Times, Nov. 18, 1922, 1p.(0022) |
2) | “Who’s Who at the Arms Conference U−Aristide Briand,” The Washington Star, Nov. 22, 1921, 1p.(0023) |
3) | “Plain words to France; British foreign minister tells her she is headed for disaster,” The New York Times, Nov. 25, 1921, 2pp.(0024-0025,0030) |
4) | “Secret propaganda calls Japan victim; document sent to delegates and diplomats accuses great Britain and America,” The New York Times, Nov. 25, 1921, 2pp.(0024-0025,0031) |
5) | “Briand’s stand considered; aspiration of France to dominate continent recalled,” The New York Times, Nov. 25, 1921, 1p.(0024-0025) |
6) | “Chinese, aroused to press claims; delegates eventalk of withdrawal if unofficial British suggestions are adopted,” The New York Times, Nov. 25, 1921, 2pp.(0024-0027,0031) |
7) | “Briand warns of Germany,” The New York Times, Nov. 25, 1921, 1p.(0024-0025) |
8) | “Hold Japan favored in 5-5-3 naval ratio,” The New York Times, Nov. 25, 1921, 1p.(0028-0029) |
9) | “Lloyd George to meet Briand on his return,” The New York Times, Nov. 25, 1921, 1p.(0030) |
10) | “Hughes denies slur by Briand on Italy; secretary in committee brands as false the report that caused anti-French riots,” The New York Times, Nov. 29, 1921, 1p.(0032) |
11) | “Briand's action a surprise; had won Cabinet over and apparently majority of chamber also,” The New York Times, Jan. 13, 1922, 1p.(0033-0034) |
12) | “De Bon calls arms conference faulty; French admiral says unsound preparations were causes of quarrels,” The New York Times, Feb. 10, 1922, 1p.(0035) |
13) | “France at the conference,” The New York Times, Feb. 20, 1922, 1p.(0036) |
14) | “Sarraut defends naval stand here; says Americans do not think as badly of France as some publicists assert,” The New York Times, Feb. 21, 1922, 1p.(0037) |
15) | “Tiger sees Harding avoids ‘Preaching’; Clemenceau says that he did not propose anything in White House call,” The New York Times, Dec. 6, 1922, 2pp.(0038-0039) |
|